A Freeman – A Common Man
(Scroll down for many videos)
Sites to check out.
Canada is a Common Wealth, We have a house of Commons,
We the people only are responsible to act upon common law based on common sense.
I am only a common man and we all have that in common…
¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤
On this page you will find a collection of Freeman on the land videos..
It is like attending a digital school of freedom…
and it is free..
so free yourselves by learning how to be free…
Being a free thinker means you need to learn to think…
So what are you waiting for?
http://freemansocietyofnovascotia.webs.com/ Information Site
World Freeman Society Introduction
Please scroll down for a complete series of videos
Freeman on the Land (USA)- Notice of Understanding and Intent
Dear, Addressed persons
I here present you with a Notice of Understanding and Intent.
I am sending this letter out as a courtesy in order to avoid any further confusion or potential conflict.
I am now expanding the reach of my discourse in order to maintain my honor and ensure maximum clarity between myself and all agents of government.
After receiving this letter, please expect a Notice of Understanding and Claim of Right in order to ensure maximum clarity amongst all parties.
As a peaceful man desiring to avoid conflict and live lawfully with maximum freedom, I have recently been studying the history of the united states along with its legal system and have come to some very interesting conclusions.
After reading various acts and exploring the way language is used in those acts, I have realized that “lawful” and “legal” are not always the same.
It also appears that all acts and statutes in US are only contracts based in commerce.
Therefore I am now contacting the various government officials named above in the hopes that someone can either confirm or correct my understanding.
If you do choose to respond with corrections, I must insist that you do so within Fourteen(14) days of service of this letter, in writing, via registered mail and provide proof of your claim, under oath or attestation with full commercial liability and penalty of perjury.
A lack of response or response that does not contain proof of my mistaken understanding, on a point-by-point basis, will be assumed to imply agreement with my understanding.
Failure to dispute the claims made herein will result in an automatic default judgment and permanent and irrevocable estoppel by acquiescence.
Now, specifically in The United States I understand that there is both a common law and statute law tradition, which is interesting, because I also understand that a statute is a legislated rule of a society, which has the force of law upon members of that society; a society being a fictional legal entity such as a corporation.
I also understand that the Government of the US is not a nation as I thought it was, occupying a geographical location, but instead merely a corporation with de-facto authority, rather than lawful.
This corporation can only make corporate/contract law that has the force of law only upon its consenting members. From my research, the “law of the land,” is the peaceful common law, which is not influenced by acts and statutes.
Under common law, the rights, freedoms, and duties of private individuals have long been established and unlike statute law, common law has had a progression towards more freedom and personal responsibility rather than less.
Among the rights and freedoms understood by common law are such things as the rights to life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness, property and use thereof, privacy, peace, and the ability to travel freely in public without harassment or intimidation.
The obligations and duties of those living under common law are essentially to ensure that one does not infringe or allow others to infringe upon those unalienable rights and freedoms.
I have also learned that the rights of a free spiritual being cannot be lawfully limited without consent, as that would imply slavery.
Effectively, rights are not bestowed upon one by another unless the first gives his/her consent, or the first is the lawful property of the second.
The very nature of the concept of consent is that it can only exist amongst equals with full disclosure and without coercion.
I do not recall ever being sold or purchased as a slave, nor do I recall giving my free consent to be governed or represented by any governmental agent, although at times I have been deceived and intimidated into submission.
Although the various rights and freedoms are self-evident and unalienable, in order to be. In order for lawful representation to exist, there must be mutual consent, and that consent may be revoked for any reason depending on the nature of a specific contract between the two parties.
I am hereby notifying all who read this and any other interested parties that I have revoked my consent to be governed by fictitious corporate entities with which I do not have a subsisting contract.
I declare that I am neither a child nor a slave, but a free man capable of administering my own affairs.
Notice of Understanding and Intent And Claim of Right
Whereas it is my understanding The United States of America is a common law jurisdiction, and,
Whereas it is my understanding equality before the law is paramount and mandatory, and,
Whereas it is my understanding a statute is defined as a legislated rule of society which has been given the force of law, and,
Whereas it is my understanding a society is defined as a number of people joined by mutual consent to deliberate, determine and act for a common goal, and,
Whereas it is my understanding the only form of government recognized as lawful in The United States of America is a representative one, and,
Whereas it is my understanding representation requires mutual consent, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that in the absence of mutual consent neither representation nor governance can exist, and,,
Whereas it is my understanding those who have a SSN (Social Security Number) are in fact employees of the federal government and thus are bound by the statutes created by the federal government, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that it is lawful to abandon one’s SSN, and,
Whereas it is my understanding people in The United States of America have a right to revoke or deny consent to be represented and thus governed, and,
Whereas it is my understanding if anyone does revoke or deny consent they exist free of government control and statutory restraints, and,
Whereas a Freeman-on-the-Land has lawfully revoked consent and does exist free of statutory restrictions, obligations, and limitations, and,
Whereas I, Given name: Family name am a Freeman-on-the-Land, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that acting peacefully within community standards does not breach
the peace, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that any action for which one can apply for and receive a license must itself be a fundamentally lawful action, and,
Whereas as I am a Freeman-on-the-Land who operates with full responsibility and not a child, I do not see the need to ask permission to engage in lawful and peaceful activities, especially from those who claim limited liability, and,
Whereas it is my understanding a by-law is defined as a rule of a corporation, and,
Whereas it is my understanding corporations are legal fictions and require contracts in order to claim authority or control over other parties, and,
Whereas it is my understanding legal fictions lack a soul and cannot exert any control over those who are thus blessed and operate with respect to that knowledge as only a fool would allow soulless fictions to dictate ones actions, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that I have a right to use my property without having to pay for the use or enjoyment of it, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that a summons is merely an invitation to attend and the ones issued by the United States or any of its agencies creates no obligation or dishonor if ignored, and,
Whereas it is my understanding peace officers have a duty to distinguish between statutes and law and those who attempt to enforce statutes against a Freeman-on-the-Land are in fact breaking the law, and,
Whereas I have the power to refuse intercourse or interaction with peace officers who have not observed me breach the peace, and,
Whereas permanent estoppel by acquiescence barring any peace officer or prosecutor from bringing charges against a Freeman-on-the-Land under any Act is created if this claim is not responded to in the stated fashion and time,
Therefore be it now known to any and all concerned and affected parties, that I, ______:_______a Freeman-on-the-Land do hereby state clearly specifically and unequivocally my intent to peacefully and lawfully exist free of all statutory obligations restrictions and maintain all rights at law to trade, exchange or barter .
Furthermore, I claim that these actions are not outside my communities’ standards and will in fact support said community in our desire for truth and maximum freedom.
Furthermore, I claim the right to engage in these actions and further claim that all property held by me is held under a claim of right.
Furthermore, I claim that anyone who interferes with my lawful activities after having been served notice of this claim and who fails to properly dispute or make lawful counterclaim is breaking the law, cannot claim good faith or colour of right and that such transgressions will be dealt with in a properly convened court de jure.
Furthermore, I claim that the courts in The United States are de-facto and are in fact in the profitable business of conducting, witnessing and facilitating the transactions of security interests and I further claim they require the consent of both parties prior to providing any such services.
Furthermore, I claim all transactions of security interests require the consent of both parties and I do hereby deny consent to any transaction of a security interest issuing under any Act for as herein stated as a Freeman-on-the-Land I am not subject to any Act.
Furthermore, I claim my FEE SCHEDULE for any transgressions by peace officers, government principals or agents or justice system participants is TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS PER HOUR or portion thereof if being questioned, interrogated or in any way detained, harassed or otherwise regulated and TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS PER HOUR or portion thereof if I am handcuffed, transported, incarcerated or subjected to any adjudication process without my express written and Notarized consent.
Furthermore, I claim the right to use a Notary Public to secure payment of the aforementioned FEE SCHEDULE against any transgressors who by their actions or omissions harm me or my interests, directly or by proxy in any way.
Furthermore, I claim the right to convene a proper court de jure in order to address any potentially criminal actions of any peace officers, government principals or agents or justice system participants who having been served notice of this claim fail to dispute or discuss or make lawful counterclaim and then interfere by act or omission with the lawful exercise of properly claimed and established rights and freedoms.
Furthermore, I claim the law of agent and principal applies and that service upon one is service upon both.
Furthermore, I claim the right to deal with any counterclaims or disputes publicly and in an open forum using discussion and negotiation and to capture on video tape said discussion and negotiation for whatever lawful purpose as I see fit.
Affected parties wishing to dispute the claims made herein or make their own counterclaims must respond appropriately within Fourteen (14) days of service of notice of this action. Responses must be under Oath or attestation, upon full commercial liability and penalty of perjury and registered in the Notary Office herein provided no later than fourteen days from the date of original service as attested to by way of certificate of service.
Failure to register a dispute against the claims made herein will result in an automatic default judgment and permanent and irrevocable estoppel by acquiescence barring the bringing of charges under any statute or Act against My Self Freeman-on-the-Land ________:________
Place of claim of right:
Notary Public: ____________________________
Use of a Notary is for attestation and verification purposes only and does not constitute a change in status or entrance or acceptance of foreign jurisdiction.
Outline and information comes from ThinkFree.ca, and can be used in any commonwealth jurisdiction.
What Is A Freeman On The Land
Robert Menard – Bursting Bubbles of Government Deception (Entire)
ThinkFree Presents – The Magnificent Deception – Robert Menard
ThinkFree.ca, http://HijackingHumanity.com and DivergentFilms brings you the limited edition version of The Magnificent Deception, Rob Menard’s newest video on the concepts of Freedom, Law, and Commerce, and how they relate to Persons, Humans, and Freesouls-On-Land.
Learn about the Notice of Understanding and Intent, and also the Claim of Right process. This is the preview version of the Sequel to Bursting Bubbles of Government Deception http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ohiyO-IcqG8
Fundamentals of Freedom1
Freeman Video 2012
Sovereignty Videos Information
Dean Clifford Tells the Truths of Freedom
The Story of Human Rights
A short clip on government resources
Robert Menard – Freeman On The Land-Wake Up – The Truth is Out There – Be Free
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ehV6i_KHOg Freeman Video 2012
The Strawman and Maritme Law Deception
Common law Right to Travel- encounters Police
Robert Menard part 1
Security of the person
Nova Scotia Securities Commission – Bureaucracy AMOK
Are you a Sovereign Yet Part 1
Freeman Lectures – Robert Menard, Luke Denis – On Money
CBC with Robert Menard & the Freeman Movement Part 1
A new but expanding group called the Freeman-on-the-Land has caught the attention of Canadian police because of the violent activity of associated groups in other countries.
Some call the Freemen a harmless fringe movement. However, as The National’s Adrienne Arsenault reports, the group may be larger and, for some, more worrying than it appears.
If you want to learn more about the World Freeman Society, visit our site at:
Or the Public Forums where 1000′s of people ask questions that Government can’t answer every day:
The Legal Definition of Freeman, according to Blacks Law can be found on our online version of Black’s Law located here:
Bouviers Law states:
FREEMAN. One who is in the enjoyment of the right to do whatever he pleases,
not forbidden by law. One in the possession of the civil rights enjoyed by,
the people generally. 1 Bouv. Inst. n. 164. See 6 Watts, 556:
We would like to add here that nowhere do Freeman from the World Freeman Society Claim they are Sovereign Citizens.
There is no such thing, it’s an oxy-moron, and has as much substance as this CBC pice of propaganda.
Peace Officers Not So Peaceful
Another effort by Freeman-on-the-Land Robert Menard this time to form a cohesive national association seeking judicial determinations of key questions in all superior courts.
It is time to bring battle. With the love, of course.
Freeman-On-The-Land Exposes The Shackles Attached To Government-Issued ID
Subscribe to Robert Menard @ http://www.youtube.com/user/mrmitee
This video re-uploaded with permission of Freeman-on-the-land Robert Menard for the subsrcribers of “Slewofdamascus” and for the general public, at-large.
Thank you, Rob!
Rob is Canadian, but all of the themes Rob touches on are applicable to residents of the United States and the United Kingdom, generally speaking.
This is part 1 of 2, or 3.
Robert Arthur Menard – Freeman on the Land
Lesson 1, Introduction – Fundamentals of Freedom (Mirror)
Robert Menard – Lesson 2 (part 1 of 2) – Words
Robert Menard – Lesson 3 (part 1 of 4) – Persons Aren’t People
Robert Menard – Lesson 4 (part 1 of 3) – Society and Statutes
Robert Menard – Lesson 5 (part 1 of 4) – Processing Knowledge
Robert Menard – Lesson 6 (part 1 of 3) – Repent SINner
Robert Menard – Lesson 7 (part 1 of 3) – Responsibility
Robert Menard – Lesson 8 (part 1 of 5) – Who Are You
freeman on the land standing in court HONOUR DISHONOUR WORLD-bankruptcy (1/4)
DISCUSSING YOUR PERSON COURTS THE LAW BANKRUPTCY ECT.
TIME TO LEARN WHO YOU ARE .
Slavery By Consent ( Full Version)
Published on 29 Mar 2012
“Every War in past 50 Years a Result of Media Lies” – Julian Assange
FAIR USE NOTICE: This video may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes only. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 106A-117 of the US Copyright Law.
Edward Mandell says to Woodrow Wilson
Edward Mandell had this to say in a private meeting with Woodrow Wilson (President) (1913-1921)
“[Very] soon, every American will be required to register their biological property in a National system designed to keep track of the people and that will operate under the ancient system of pledging.
By such methodology, we can compel people to submit to our agenda, which will affect our security as a chargeback for our fiat paper currency.
Every American will be forced to register or suffer not being able to work and earn a living.
They will be our chattel, and we will hold the security interest over them forever, by operation of the law merchant under the scheme of secured transactions.
Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills of lading to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, forever to remain economic slaves through taxation, secured by their pledges.
They will be stripped of their rights and given a commercial value designed to make us a profit and they will be non the wiser, for not one man in a million could ever figure our plans and, if by accident one or two would figure it out, we have in our arsenal plausible deniability.
After all, this is the only logical way to fund government, by floating liens and debt to the registrants in the form of benefits and privileges.
This will inevitably reap to us huge profits beyond our wildest expectations and leave every American a contributor or to this fraud which we will call “Social Insurance.” Without realizing it, every American will insure us for any loss we may incur and in this manner; every American will unknowingly be our servant, however begrudgingly.
The people will become helpless and without any hope for their redemption and, we will employ the high office of the President of our dummy corporation to foment this plot against America.”
Freedom is natural. It is our birthright; in fact, it is who we truly are.
We are free right now and we can demonstrate our freedom from this point on, simply by controlling our contracting; always staying in honor.
Sovereigns make use of questions and negative averments, rather than positive statements that may then need to be proved. Sovereigns turn every argument that we may be inclined to make into a conditional acceptance.
In this way, we control our property, starting with our bodies and our minds, which is what freedom & sovereignty is all about.
Responding to Offers or Demands
We have an unlimited ability to contract with our fellow human beings in any way that we choose. Our choices are dependent not upon our circumstances, but only upon our knowledge and will and creative intelligence.
Whether in commerce or law or life, whenever someone demands something from us, it is an offer to contract. There are only five ways we can respond to an offer to contract.
1) We can ignore;
2) We can argue or contest;
3) We can reject the offer or refuse for cause, without dishonor, as long as it is an erroneous claim and there is no liability evidenced (see UCC 3-501);
4) We can accept; or
5) We can conditionally accept.
Ignoring is dishonoring, both to the offerer and the offeree. In commerce, it means agreeing by acquiescence. If someone sends us a bill and we ignore it, we have committed a commercial dishonor and we have agreed that we owe it. They have become the creditor in the matter and we have become the debtor/ slave.
Arguing is dishonoring to everyone as well, no matter how righteous it seems. Ultimately, no points of view are absolutely valid and in a fight, force and deception are relied upon by all but the saintliest of parties. The loser will certainly become a debtor in the matter; the victor’s creditorship may be a crime.
Honorably rejecting and the two ways of accepting are the only ways we can remain in honor and take full responsibility for our life and our world and not be a victim or a debtor. Full acceptance is appropriate when we agree with the substance and form of whatever is being offered. Conditional acceptance is more appropriate when we are not sure about those things.
All conditional acceptances are counter-offers: “Sure, I’ll go to town with you if you help me clean up that mess first” OR “Sure, I’ll accept that upon proof of your claim, in the form of a signed affidavit by you, under penalties of perjury and under your personal, unlimited commercial liability”.
Learning how to accept conditionally is fundamental to learning how to remain in creditor relationship with and be able to freely control any situation.
Private vs. Public
It is important to know the difference between the private and the public, because we all have private and public identities and we can handle private and public affairs from the private, but we cannot handle private affairs from the public. This latter is one of the biggest mistakes many people make when trying to handle their commercial and lawful (private) or legal (public) affairs.
In our society, the private ‘Strawman’ was created by the application for the birth certificate; it is an international vessel in maritime law.
The public STRAWMAN was created by the application for the Social Security card; it is the national vessel in the law of admiralty.
John Doe is a non-resident alien in relation to the public. He exists in the republic. He has inalienable rights and unlimited liabilities.
JOHN DOE is a U.S. citizen. He exists in the democracy. He has benefits and obligations and limited liability.
In the private, money is an asset and always in the form of something that has intrinsic value, i.e. gold or silver. Payment for anything is in the form of commercial set off, now.
In the public, money is a liability and normally in the form of a promissory note, i.e. an FRN, a check, bond or note. Payment is in the form of discharge; in the future.
The private realm is the basis for all contract and commerce; the public was created by the bankruptcy of the private entity. Generally, creditors can operate from the private. Public entities are all debtors (or slaves).
Therefore, it is good to learn how to be a creditor in all of our affairs. Freedom is possible in the private; it is not even a valid fantasy in the realm of the public.
Creditor or Debtor
Playing well the game of commerce means being a creditor, not a debtor.
Debtors take positions, defend what they know and make statements about it; they ignore, argue and/or contest. Extreme debtor-minded people presume victimhood and seek to limit their liability. Debtors operate unwittingly from and within the public venue. They are satisfied with mere equitable title – they can own and operate, but not totally control their property. Debtor possibilities are limited and confining, as debtors are slaves.
Creditors are present to whatever opportunity arises; they ask questions to bring remedy if called for; they accept, either fully or conditionally. Accomplished creditors take full responsibility for their life, their finances and their world. Creditors understand and make use of their unlimited ability to contract privately with anyone they want at any time. They maintain legal title and control of their property. Creditor possibilities are infinite. Creditors are sovereign and free.
Three Useful Tools
We want to establish facts for the record, but it is best to be careful making positive statements (that may have to be proven); instead, whoever is making demands, put it on them to make positive statements – make them prove it.
1) Negative Averment: An averment that is negative in form but affirmative in substance that must be proved by the alleging party. “There is no evidence that I am not correct in this matter and there is no evidence that you are not wrong in this matter, and I don’t believe that any such evidence exists.” You’re stating what is not; not what is.
2) Confession & Avoidance: A response in which the accused admits (via passive acquiescence) the allegations but asks for additional facts that deprive the admitted facts of an adverse legal effect. Accusation: “Is this your signature on this document?” Response(s): “Is there a defect in that instrument?” “Well tell me the defect is and I’ll correct it.” Frogdot 1246675 “Well, if there is no defect in the instrument, then why are you here?” “Why should I answer your question when you can’t even answer mine?” “Are you telling me that you are not even qualified to make any determinations on that negotiable instrument?” “Why are you here?”
3) Conditional Acceptance: A response, in honor without argument, that is a counter-offer. The only offer that is ever relevant is the one on top. Offer: “Let’s go to town and go shopping.” Counter-offer(s): “Sure, just come over and help me finish cleaning up the kitchen first.” “I’ll accept that upon proof of bona-fide claim in the form of a signed affidavit by you under penalty of perjury and under your own personal, unlimited commerical liablility within 30 days.”
Frank Parenteau le Vrai says, In USA they wanna ban Freemans and i heard Quebec police declaring on radio that they were a dangerous organisation ,can you fuck and beleive this ,i was freeking out in the car ,they are doing this those bastards
Daniel J Towsey says, That is why having a leaderless resistance is the only way..we all need to learn to lead ourselves to the path of freedom….Learning and spreading the truth is the only way.
All societies are doomed if they are not based on the sanity of truth..That is why the insane NWO has to be exposed to the blinding light of truth..Truth is POWER.
Hi Daniel. hope you are well . just to tell you. ref IRELAND AND THE LIES OF THE LAST 93YRS. EIRE IS SOVEREIGN ON THE RECORD SNICE 1919.
WE WERE LIED TOO FOR THAT TIME BUT THE TRUTH IS COMING OUT.
I THINK YOU ARE IN CANADA SO THIS COULD HAVE A BEARING ON YOU.
WE HAVE A PROVISIONAL GOVERNMENT.AGENT FOR THE CROWN, THE QUEEN .
I AM SICK AND TIRED OF PEOPLE ,FROM OTHER NATIONS BLAMING THE IRISH FOR THE BANKS.
WE DO NOT OWE THE BANKS ANY THING BUT THE QUEEN AND PEOPLE OF ENGLAND DO. MANY OF US KNOW WE ARE SOVEREIGN BUT SOME IRISH PEOPLE DO NOT.
SO TOMORROW IS IRELANDS INDEPENDENCE DAY. IN DUBLIN.
IF YOU GO ON MY TIME LINE ,YOU WILL SEE BUT FOR THE LAST FEW DAYS ,WHEN I TRYED TO POST ANY THING REF THIS,MY PC WENT DOWN.
LAST NIGHT I WAS TO SPEAK TO A FRIEND IN THE USA ABOUT THE SOVEREIGN.I WAS BLOCKED AND SO WAS SHE.
NOT SURE IF IT ANY THING TO DO ,WITH SOVEREIGN BUT ITS STRANG. PEACE BREDA MURPHY[NOT RUDE EYES SORE DUE TO CHEMTRAILS]
if you have time,Please see www.wethepeople.ie
Also www.Billy McGuier.com Please kept a eye on what is happening in Eire/IRELAND .FOR Your country .
Eire is the only Nation that is Sovereign. Pease Breda
THE NWO HATES THE IRISH. WELL ,WE WERE FIGHTING THEM FOR 800YRS .
IF THEY GET THEIR WAY. THE PEOPLE OF SCOTLAND WILL GO 1ST.
THEN THE IRISH. AND TWO OTHER NATIONS. BREDA
Daniel J Towsey says,
Did you know that a short while ago MI5 and MI6 admitted to having infiltrated both religions in Ireland and they the British were the ones doing all the false flag bombings and attacks in Ireland?
Always remember: A NOTICE in Law is NOT a BILL.
You don’t have to pay a NOTICE. It is only an ‘offer’ of a contract.
Remedy: Return it to sender. Simple.
The video above explains how to cancel an eflow Notice by Letter.
PH: AARON 087-2297888. GET SOLUTIONS NOW.
No information posted on this site may be deemed advice legal, lawful or otherwise.
Are You A Sovereign Citizen?
Dave Hodges, Contributor
Governments never stop trying to find ways to cast legitimate dissenters in a negative light. In the 1990s when as the globalists began to play their hand in earnest (e.g. NAFTA, Waco, Ruby Ridge, etc.), anyone who spoke out against the international corridor highway system (NAFTA and CAFTA), was opposed to job-sucking free trade agreements and was opposed to the regionalization of the US into the North American Union was labeled as a “conspiracy theorist.” Anyone who saw a conspiracy in anything, any person, or any event, was labeled as being mentally ill.
In the last decade, the term conspiracy theorist began to give way to certain patriotic traits which no legitimate government should have had a concern with. Only this time, if one opposed anything that the government did, the person was labeled a domestic terrorist.
Most aware citizens will have no trouble remembering the upsetting contents of the MIAC Report which served to declare an individual a domestic terrorist if they supported Ron Paul, demanded the government follow the Constitution, was pro-Second Amendment, was a Libertarian, a Constitutionalist, a returning veteran or was opposed in any form to the Federal Reserve. Subsequently, the alternative, and truthful media, roundly criticized this anti-American document and slowly, but surely, the MIAC report faded from public view as it lost legitimacy.
The MIAC Report, Gone But Not Forgotten
The newest globalist trick to quell dissent and subsequently violate the rights of legitimate government protesters is to hide under the guise of being labeled “THE SOVEREIGN CITIZEN.” Under no circumstances should an American identify themselves as a sovereign citizen. To do so, could have very dire consequences.
The term “sovereign citizen” is deceptive because in political discussions about who has the power in society, the term gets used quite often. For example, if the people are the sovereign, then the people have power over the government. If on the other hand, the government has power over the citizenry, it could be accurately said that the government is the sovereign. Yet, again, my strong advice to all Americans is to avoid using the term all together and in the following paragraphs, I detail why.
The Stacy Lynne Case
Stacy Lynne is the beleaguered mother of a nine-year-old boy, who had her little boy stolen by a corrupt judge, Julie Kunce Fields, in retaliation for Stacy’s anti-Agenda 21 public presentations which were serving to slow down the ICLEI invasion of Fort Collins, Colorado. For her trouble, Stacy, without so much of an allegation of wrongdoing, lost total custody of her son was given to the biological father who, by all accounts, previously showed little interest in being a father to Jaden. The judge is a former consultant to the IMF and the World Bank. Field is a globalist and this was her first judgeship. She was brought in to silence Stacy by stealing her child in order to derail her anti-Agenda 21 activities. You can read about this heinous case here. The only negative that Field has ever written or said about Stacy is that Stacy Lynne is a sovereign citizen. This legal declaration first took place on December 21, 2011, the day Stacy lost custody of Jaden. Stacy read the court order, which severed her custodial rights to We Are Change Colorado, as Stacy noted that Field had declared her to be a “sovereign citizen.”
I have watched the video of this several times and I am still confused about what constitutes a sovereign citizen. At least I was confused until I recently read a police magazine which goes out to every police department in America in which they addressed what exactly constitutes a sovereign citizen.
The New Domestic Terrorist: A Sovereign Citizen
As it turns out, labeling someone as a “sovereign citizen” is the 2013 version of the discredited MIAC Report which labeled Ron Paul supporters, Second Amendment advocates, returning veterans and people who support the Constitution as domestic terrorists.
|Get Your Federal Firearms License|
The strategy is simple: if one criticizes the government in any form they can be labeled a sovereign citizen. And if the government can label one a sovereign citizen, then that citizen has no rights and ostensibly, the government can do what they will with that citizen.
This anti-dissident strategy takes America one step away from full implementation of disappearing American protesters under the NDAA for sovereign citizens. This is a very slippery slope and the government and its police agencies are fully committed to this strategy.
What Exactly Is A Sovereign Citizen?
As one traces the origin of the term sovereign citizen, in its contemporary vernacular, the term gained its roots in a shoot-out following a routine traffic stop in Arkansas as it turned into an violent confrontation between police and a father-son pair of so-called “sovereign citizens.” According to the corporate-controlled media, this event, which occurred on July 1, 2010, ”brought attention to a secretive and dangerous subculture which believes American laws don’t apply to them.”
The federal government was quick to seize on this opportunity and bootstrap the term to any group that the federal government feels would oppose any of its policies. In short, if you do not like some aspect of government, you are now one the new domestic terrorists and should be subject to governmental control outside the bounds of constitutional protections.
Police Magazine, provide the first real comprehensive definition of what constitutes a sovereign citizen as they note that the crimes committed by sovereigns often include relatively minor offenses such as the manufacture of fraudulent license plates, registration cards, or currency (e.g. use of gold coins). So, in the first part of this definition, sovereign citizens are defined as essentially petty criminals. Wait a minute, we were told under the Bush administration that we had to give up our civil liberties so the government could protect us from terribly dangerous terrorists. Sorry DHS, I just don’t see how a petty criminal constitutes a national security threat. Further, the magazine stated that all of these people should be considered to be armed and dangerous and that the calling in of a SWAT team during routine traffic stops might not be an overreaction to the threat posed by sovereigns.
The police can further identify a dangerous sovereign individual if they complain about mortgage fraud, or banking fraud. Police Magazine notes that the tactics employed by “sovereigns” are not always violent. I had to read that last statement twice as I try and determine what is the extreme danger to society. The case in point here, would be Stacy Lynne’s opposition to Agenda 21 policies in Fort Collins, Colorado. The police are also cautioned to be on the lookout for words like “Indigenous,” “Sovereign,” “Diplomatic,” “Exempt,” or “Private Property” displayed on the personalized license plates.
Police officers are advised that Sovereigns will engage in willful terrorism because they may actually video-record their interactions with law enforcement officers. To the contrary, the courts have upheld citizens’ right to video the police. Police can expect to be further intimidated as some of these encounters are live-streamed via the Internet and watched by local like-minded sovereigns, and this could pose a threat a possible threat to police safety. So if one has a YouTube channel, they might be a sovereign citizen. Police are also cautioned to be aware of certain dangerous key words that sovereigns are likely to use such as “oath of office”, “traveling in a private capacity”, “domicile” and the “14th Amendment.”
“Sovereign citizen groups, with few exceptions and despite their differences, will choose to unite against their one common enemy: the government and its agents.” I thought our Founding Fathers encouraged future generations to oppose all forms tyranny emanating from the government. What did Jefferson say? Something like resistance to tyranny is obedience to God.
One would be wise to avoid being labeled with the new domestic terrorist term, sovereign citizen. Carried out to its extreme, as in the case of Stacy Lynne, a sovereign citizen is not something that one wants to be labeled as the term is bootstrapping all legitimate concerns about the government and virtually criminalizing dissent and protest. And with the NDAA hanging over American heads, admitting to being a sovereign citizen could be a very bad idea.
RELATED ACTIVIST POST ARTICLE:
Be a Proud Conspiracy Theorist, You’re in the Majority
Dave is an award winning psychology, statistics and research professor, a college basketball coach, a mental health counselor, a political activist and writer who has published dozens of editorials and articles in several publications such as Freedoms Phoenix, News With Views and The Arizona Republic.
The Common Sense Show features a wide variety of important topics that range from the loss of constitutional liberties, to the subsequent implementation of a police state under world governance, to exploring the limits of human potential. The primary purpose of The Common Sense Show is to provide Americans with the tools necessary to reclaim both our individual and national sovereignty.